eBay’s Asia Pacific marketing manager
Jaehyun Lee conducted this special lecture under the theme of ‘eBay and next
generation e-commerce.’ At first he introduced eBay’s general business including
eBay, PayPal and then moved to future trends in e-commerce industry. Two things
captured my eyes during his lecture. One was importance of PayPal and the other
was CBT (Cross Border Trade). Now PayPal – an email based cash transaction
service – played a great role to boost up e-commerce. Not only eBay used PayPal
but also more than 100,000 web sites accepted PayPal for their transaction
because of PayPal’s convenient and secured transaction. It means that eBay now
has the power to take control of much virtual transaction in e-commerce. In my
opinion, business model of PayPal can be compared to the that of traveler’s
check by American Express Card, since an organization that are able to control
much of cash transaction might earn much money by leveraging those transactions
eventually. CBT was also very interesting model to me. Now virtually anybody in
the world could sell his/her products through eBay’s CBT without the limitation
of border. Sellers in the China, Korea or Japan don’t need to open their real
shop in the US to sell their products. Instead now they can upload their
products in the eBay’s auction site and then they could sell their products
through eBay. eBay helps those local sellers by supporting organized logistics.
Now we are seeing virtually integrated global market at CBT. CBT definitely
will drive the growth of e-commerce market for the long time. For local
sellers, this will increase the direct accessibility to customers, decrease
time to reach customers, and will decrease complicated skill to promote their
products in global market. Whether many government try to regulate this kind of
CBT or not, CBT will be megatrends in global e-commerce market in near future,
I think. At Q&A session Dave asked why some Korean services or products
like Cyworld, iLoveShool, Tablet PC from Samsung, Saerom’s Dialpad failed in
global market. This question has been under discussion between Dave and me for
long time. Regarding this question, he expressed his some opinions. First,
those products or services were introduced too early to the market. So it was
almost impossible to reach the mass to ignite the market. Second, those were
technologically or functionally poor to meet customers’ emotional needs.
Lastly, he pointed Korean company’s poor marketing capabilities. With his
opinions, Dave and I concluded the discussion like these. 1. Unlike many Korean
people’s opinions, Korean companies already have shown much creativity and
software skills. The rising of Facebook, Skype and Apple could not be explained
by Korean company’s lacking of creativity or software. 2. In terms of intangible products or
services, Korean companies neglected the importance of cultural differences
outside of Korea and Korean companies also didn’t have many experiences in
promoting and marketing those intangible things globally. 3. Korean companies
isolated their products or services within their own regime. So, they were
unable to construct unique ecosystem opened to 3rd party.
'경영관련 > KAIST MBA' 카테고리의 다른 글
JMnet CRM (2) | 2011.01.04 |
---|---|
BMEA 12/10 (0) | 2010.12.10 |
BMEA 11월 26일 (0) | 2010.11.26 |
뉴 미디어 시대의 콘텐츠 가치 회복 (0) | 2010.11.23 |
BMEA 11/19 (0) | 2010.11.19 |
스마트폰 환경과 OS 전쟁 (4) | 2010.11.16 |
BMEA 11/12 (0) | 2010.11.12 |
스마트 기업으로 가는 길 (0) | 2010.11.09 |
Enforcement of China's Accounting Standards by Sonja Opper (0) | 2010.11.08 |
Urban Innovation for Cities of the Future (0) | 2010.11.02 |